加拿大华人论坛 加拿大留学移民保守党在法律能否回溯问题上持双重标准

在加拿大

http://www.bellissimolawgroup.com/2...rliamentarians-but-what-about-immigrants.html In a discussion on Power and Politics, Conservative Member of Parliament Chris Alexander for Ajax-Pickering defended fellow conservative MPs, James Bezan and Shelly Glover in regards to their 2011 election returns and allegations regarding expense over the legal limit in violation of the Elections Act, stating that Elections Canada retroactively revised certain requirements after the returns had been accepted. “. . . That is a principle of Canadian law that is sacrosanct,” said Alexander, “you can’t revise things retroactively.” ​Really?What about his Conservative government’s decision to terminate the Federal Skilled Worker immigration backlog of nearly 300,000 persons with applications dating as far back as 2004, retroactively? Immigration Minister Jason Kenney has argued that the purpose of eliminating the backlog is to ensure that newcomers meet Canada’s current labour market needs and shortages. Most immigration applicants are indeed concerned with processing timelines and employment opportunities but equally important to them is the certainty of selection. Certainty of selection, if the termination stands, legally and otherwise will be relegated to the scrapheap, replaced by a reality of looming retroactivity whenever the perceived need arises. This legal foundation in my mind is not sustainable as immigration categories will become moving targets like for these applicants who could not know for the past eight years, in some cases, what was going to come of their application. We are already dealing with the long shadow of disturbing Canadian demographics such as a 1.5 per cent declining fertility rate and so despite what some will have you believe, this is a serious blow to the integrity of our immigration system and government. Integrity is the corner stone of good governance. We must strive to fashion our immigration law in a manner that preserves our international reputation as a country of invitation and openness and, at the same time, promotes economic, social and cultural nation building. The matter remains in litigation before the Federal Court of Appeal and curiously despite what is at stake, the media spotlight and the contemplation of at least one Conservative parliamentarian has faded. Integrity and sacrosanctity are giving way to governmental administrative efficiency and now armed with a strong legal precedent of repugnant retroactive application in the immigration context Canadians in many aspects of their interaction with government may soon be asking what really is legally sacrosanct?

评论
​ 超赞 赏 L Les Paradis 0$(VIP 0) 3,7882013-07-03#2 回复: 保守党在法律能否回溯问题上持双重标准保守党议员在为同伴过去的选举丑闻做辩护的时候说：加拿大法律是神圣不可侵犯的，不能用回溯法律的方式修改过去发生的事情。 “一刀切”法律正是保守党搞出来的“修改过去发生的事情”的回溯法律。看来对于回溯问题，保守党是持双重标准的，对于他们自己过去的丑闻，大言不惭的表示不能回溯去追究。 我想Bellissimo会把这个证据拿到联邦上诉院去做辩论

评论
​ 超赞 赏 frankpenn 0$(VIP 0) 6762013-07-03#3 回复: 保守党在法律能否回溯问题上持双重标准多谢分享. 托利党不要脸的地方真不少.

评论
91被切， 51幸运通过， 奋战在大温的新的老移民。保守党议员在为同伴过去的选举丑闻做辩护的时候说：加拿大法律是神圣不可侵犯的，不能用回溯法律的方式修改过去发生的事情。 “一刀切”法律正是保守党搞出来的“修改过去发生的事情”的回溯法律。看来对于回溯问题，保守党是持双重标准的，对于他们自己过去的丑闻，大言不惭的表示不能回溯去追究。 我想Bellissimo会把这个证据拿到联邦上诉院去做辩论点击展开... 然后法官再问，不能用回溯法律能不能适用外国人？答案是可以回溯外国人，这帮不要脸的

评论
回复: 保守党在法律能否回溯问题上持双重标准所以说洋人就是一肚子鬼，搞起阴谋来还是很强悍的。

评论
​ 超赞 赏 大 大地江海 0$(VIP 0) 532013-07-03#6 回复: 保守党在法律能否回溯问题上持双重标准请把手中掌握的信息及时转发律师，为律师提供子弹

评论
回复: 保守党在法律能否回溯问题上持双重标准所以说洋人就是一肚子鬼，搞起阴谋来还是很强悍的。点击展开...广东人给洋人的评价：鬼佬。

  ·生活百科 询问中国鞋码标准
·生活百科 我可以在机场或赌场兑换 100 澳元纸币吗？