加拿大华人论坛 加拿大留学移民S2的同学，律师建议一定先补料!
在加拿大
My advice would be to send in everything anyway. There undoubtedly will be a class-action lawsuit arising out of the legislation. So, better to be one step ahead of others than to do nothing.My own view is (a) the legislation will pass unless the Government withdraws it because the Conservatives have a clear majority in the House and (b) the legislation would be lawful because the Government has the right to decide whom it will admit to Canada. However, that is only the beginning. The Government has the right to cancel contracts but may be liable for damages for having done so. If the Court agrees that damages may be awarded, CIC might change its tune. By submitting all the documents, etc., s/he will be able to prove that CIC was poised to assess the file before cancelling it, putting him/her in a stronger position than some others.Once we have the order for the application, I expect to file action for damages for our lead litigant. If the Court does not dismiss the case, CIC will realize that it risks suits from all those whose files it has threatened to close and might back down. We'll see.
评论
06年底简表递HK07年5月16日FN VO LCY11年再考YS，自评67分S2 快来吧回复: S2的同学，律师建议一定先补料!顶Tim
评论
回复: S2的同学，律师建议一定先补料!以静制动（别误会，不是不补料） 后发制人
评论
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]他们欺瞒上帝偷偷拨回时间They fool God secretly timing of the reversal回复: S2的同学，律师建议一定先补料!顶
·中文新闻 科林伍德 (Collingwood) 明星尼克·戴科斯 (Nick Daicos) 被指控在事件
·中文新闻 我赢得了学徒奖，但我却破产了……这就是为什么糖勋爵是时候