在加拿大
In Kanes v. Minister of Citizenship and Immigration (1993), 72 F.T.R. 226 (F.C.T.D.), Cullen J. held that the delay in processing the applicant's claim was unreasonable not because of its specific duration, but because it resulted in a severe substantive detriment to the applicant following a legislative amendment. He stated at paragraph 26 that, in such circumstances, "the change in the legislation cannot be used to operate to the detriment of the applicant." Likewise, in Meikle v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) (1997), 137 F.T.R. 304 (F.C.T.D.), Heald D.J. ruled [at paragraph 17] that a delay of 20 months was unreasonable where it "had the effect of depriving the applicant of rights already vested in him".Kanes一案中,拖延处理是不合理的,不是因为期限长,而是对申请人导致了特别实质性的损害(在变法之后),在这种情况下,“法规的变动不能被用于损害申请人”。类似的,在Meikle 诉. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) (1997)一案中,Heald判决“20个月的拖延是不合理的,这已起到剥夺申请人权利之效果”
评论
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]他们欺瞒上帝偷偷拨回时间They fool God secretly timing of the reversal 赏
评论
回复: 举两个案例,大家研究下,当前危局下可能有用这个是正道,难兄难弟们都来瞧瞧~~
·加拿大新闻 全新一代奔驰GLB发布!外挂造型更大气,搭载悬浮式三联屏
·加拿大新闻 盟友变敌人?!美国新版国家安全战略何以影响加拿大?
·加拿大新闻 多伦多妇女被追讨逾2.5万元社会福利 申诉专员轰市府不公平对
·加拿大新闻 [更新] 豪雨导致河水暴涨阿波斯福940户接疏散警报
·加拿大新闻 突发:加拿大央行维持利率不变!明年可能加息?老百姓一片哀
·中文新闻 书评:乔治·帕克的《紧急情况》提供了美国未来的反乌托邦愿
·中文新闻 霍克斯伯里比赛、周日比赛、比赛技巧和周日霍克斯伯里会议的