加拿大华人论坛 加拿大留学移民肯尼大叔新动作，苦了

在加拿大

2010年10月2号，加拿大移民法修正案，针对结婚担保移民，say no不用给你原因。

评论
回复: 肯尼大叔新动作，苦了.

评论
BJ Case: 2010.8.20递料-8.23签收-9.21DM-9.27DM信-9.29FNE-9.30状态14-10.5 CIC IP-10.6FNL/状态12-10.8护照寄出-10.11状态5/护照妥投-10.13状态12-10.20状态17-10.23大信封-10.28双DM-11.8登温-12.10枫叶卡...@Vancouver温哥华姐妹群：136027631 ​回复: 肯尼大叔新动作，苦了这是什么意思？？？SAY NO 不给原因，那岂不是带有很严重的个人色彩。不可能的，他们一定得提供EVIDENCE 来说明你NO的原因。不然解释不通啊

评论
我在加拿大一路学习一路成长2010年10月2号，加拿大移民法修正案，针对结婚担保移民，say no不用给你原因。点击展开...加拿大移民法修正案，关于团聚移民只有这一条有变化吗？

评论
回复: 肯尼大叔新动作，苦了这么弄的话 明显加大了大家上诉的概率啊

评论
我在加拿大一路学习一路成长2010年10月2号，加拿大移民法修正案，针对结婚担保移民，say no不用给你原因。点击展开...有相关的报道或是链接吗？

评论
简单幸福的生活ing..........2010年10月2号，加拿大移民法修正案，针对结婚担保移民，say no不用给你原因。点击展开...香港的童鞋都习惯了　漂过

评论
赏 有相关的报道或是链接吗？点击展开...同问。

评论
===================Fight, Love, Make Mistake回复: 肯尼大叔新动作，苦了我在加看到电视新闻，自2010年9月30日起实施。1：打击以移民为目的的真结婚2：打击假结婚。

评论
回复: 肯尼大叔新动作，苦了操 康尼

评论
回复: 肯尼大叔新动作，苦了我在加看到电视新闻，自2010年9月30日起实施。1：打击以移民为目的的真结婚2：打击假结婚。点击展开...2010年9月30日开始实施的修改法，应该是针对9月30日以后递交的CASE吧？还是审理中的CASE也适用啊？

评论
赏 2010年9月30日开始实施的修改法，应该是针对9月30日以后递交的CASE吧？还是审理中的CASE也适用啊？点击展开...同样关注

评论
2010年来到ALBERTA生活在努力继续2010年9月30日开始实施的修改法，应该是针对9月30日以后递交的CASE吧？还是审理中的CASE也适用啊？点击展开...这个时间很关键。到底应该是递交还是审理来算呢？

评论
回复: 肯尼大叔新动作，苦了我在加看到电视新闻，自2010年9月30日起实施。1：打击以移民为目的的真结婚2：打击假结婚。点击展开...什么叫打击以移民为目的的真结婚？？难不成别人真结婚了还一辈子拿工签为加拿大付出没有回报的？打击一下假结婚中介才是真的

评论
回复: 肯尼大叔新动作，苦了什么叫打击以移民为目的的真结婚？？难不成别人真结婚了还一辈子拿工签为加拿大付出没有回报的？ 打击一下假结婚中介才是真的点击展开...

评论
回复: 肯尼大叔新动作，苦了Operational Bulletin 238 - September 30, 2010Amendment to Section 4 of the RegulationsIssueAn amendment to section 4 of the Immigration and Refugee Protection Regulations was brought into force by an Order-in-Council decree today, September 30, 2010.Citizenship and Immigration Canada (CIC) and Canada Border Services Agency (CBSA) officers must commence applying the new provision on the day on which it entered into force. Therefore, effective today, CIC and CBSA officers must apply the new provision to allnew applications, all applications in process for which a final decision has not yet been rendered and all new and pending appeals before the Immigration Appeal Division (IAD).BackgroundThe former R4 provision required two mandatory elements for determining “bad faith” relationships:(a) that a relationship not be genuine; and(b) that it was entered into primarily for the purpose of acquiring any status or privilege under the Act.Although a “bad faith” relationship exists when either of these related factors is apparent, both elements had to be met when refusing a case under this Regulation and when supporting that decision on appeal.In addition, the “bad faith” assessment for adoptions was combined in the former R4 with the assessment for marriages, common-law and conjugal partnerships, although the criteria for assessing an adoptive relationship differ from that used to assess the genuineness of the other relationships. An overlap between the “bad faith” assessment for adopted persons entering Canada as accompanying family members and adopted persons being sponsored as members of the Family Class (R117) led to additional ambiguity with respect to the assessment of genuineness for adoptions.Amended provisionThe amended R4 provision provides for each of the two “bad faith” tests to stand on its own and separates the requirement related to spouses, common-law partners and conjugal partners (R4(1)) from that related to adopted children (R4(2)). The amended R4 provision reads as follows:4. (1) For the purposes of these Regulations, a foreign national shall not be considered a spouse, a common-law partner or a conjugal partner of a person if the marriage, common-law partnership or conjugal partnership(a) was entered into primarily for the purpose of acquiring any status or privilege under the Act; or(b) is not genuine.4. (2) A foreign national shall not be considered an adopted child of a person if the adoption(a) was entered into primarily for the purpose of acquiring any status or privilege under the Act; or(b) did not create a genuine parent-child relationship.4. (3) Subsection (2) does not apply to adoptions referred to in paragraph 117(1)(g) and subsections 117(2) and (4).Note that R4(2) applies to the assessment of adoptions which did not conform to the intercountry adoption process, such as domestic adoptions completed in the country of origin, and, therefore, lacked the involvement of provincial adoption authorities.For greater clarity, within the context of a R4(2) adoption, the term “genuine” is associated with the assessment of the parent-child relationship.Subsection R117(2) of the Regulations, which deals with the sponsorship of adopted children by citizens or permanent residents of Canada, has also been amended. The addition of subsection (b) now provides for an assessment of the bona fides of the adoption. R117(2) is, therefore, now consistent with R117(1)(g) and R117(4) which also require an assessment of whether the adoption was primarily “for the purpose of acquiring any status or privilege under the Act”. Hence, there is no need for officers to consider the provisions of R4(2) within the context of a sponsored application for a permanent resident visa for an adopted child which is being processed under section R117 of the Regulations.The amended Subsection R117(2) is as follows:R117(2) A foreign national who is the adopted child of a sponsor and whose adoption took place when the child was under the age of 18 shall not be considered a member of the family class by virtue of the adoption unless(a) the adoption was in the best interests of the child within the meaning of the Hague Convention on Adoption; and(b) the adoption was not entered into primarily for the purpose of acquiring any status or privilege under the Act.ImplicationsAssessing the bona fides of spousal, common-law or conjugal relationshipsThese changes will enable CIC and CBSA to deal more effectively with marriages of convenience, an ongoing issue of concern. They will allow officers to determine that a spousal, common-law or conjugal relationship is not bona fide if it is either not genuine or was entered into primarily for the purpose of acquiring a status or privilege under the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act. Henceforth, only one of the two criteria will need to be present to determine that a relationship is not bona fide.Assessing adoptions under R4(2)With respect to accompanying children who have been adopted or children whose adoptions may not be processed under R117, the adoption may henceforth be determined to be a relationship of convenience or entered into in “bad faith” if it was either entered into primarily for the purpose of acquiring any status or privilege under the Act or does not create a genuine parent-child relationship.Assessing adoptions under R117(2)The addition of subsection R117(2)(b) to the Regulations clarifies that the adoption of a sponsored child under the age of 18 cannot be undertaken primarily for the purpose of acquiring any status or privilege under the Act.Hearings before the IADSince a hearing before the IAD is de novo,as opposed to a judicial review of a decision, the IAD will base its decisions on the law that is presently in force at the time of the hearing and not the law that was in force at the time of the original decision by the officer.

评论
回复: 肯尼大叔新动作，苦了加拿大移民部修改移民及难民法(Immigration and Refugee Protection Act)第4条，有关移民官判断配偶移民申请者是否合格的规定。修正后的最大改变，在于移民官只需要相信婚姻目的是为了移民，即使是“真结婚”的配偶，也可被拒绝移民申请。让我们来看看移民部在Canada Gazette上公布的移民法第4条修正案的内容： “Under the current provision, it has been difficult to properly identify these relationships. This is because R4, as it currently reads, specifies two mandatory elements for determining “bad faith” relationships: (a) that a relationship is not genuine and (b) that it was entered into primarily for the purpose of acquiring any status or privilege under the Act. This leads to a requirement that CIC be satisfied that both elements have not been met when refusing a case under this regulation and supporting that decision on appeal. However, a “bad faith” relationship is present when either of these related factors is apparent. ” 老的移民法规定移民官必须要有证据相信：（1）担保人和配偶的婚姻是虚假的婚姻；（2）配偶和担保人结婚的目的纯粹是为了移民；只有这两者成立移民官才有权利拒绝其申请。但修正后的移民法，在于移民官只需有证据证明两者有一项成立即可将申请拒绝。 移民部在公告移民法第4条修正细则时说，以前的法令，对于何谓“不诚实”（Bad Faith）的定义有欠清楚的地方，在条文修正后变得更完善，不会轻易遭人利用。修改后的移民法有可能使得真正真实的配偶移民被拒，但是又没有足够的上诉机会。 因为修改后的移民法给予了移民官更大的权限，来认定配偶移民申请人的资格问题。使得移民官只需要根据证据判断配偶移民申请者的婚姻目的是为了移民，即使是“真结婚”的配偶，也可能被拒绝移民。 加拿大移民部过去对于结婚移民申请案，已采取了非常严格的审查措施，要详细了解双方从认识到结婚的过程，并要求申请人出示双方的往来信件、电话账单，甚至要求申请人说出对方的生活细节。其实要配偶和担保人提供婚姻关系真实性的材料并不难，但要提供“配偶和担保人结婚的目的不纯粹是为了移民”就比较困难了，毕竟这一指标是软性的。但根据以往的经验，应该还是有一些规律可循。

评论
回复: 肯尼大叔新动作，苦了2010年9月30日开始实施的修改法，应该是针对9月30日以后递交的CASE吧？还是审理中的CASE也适用啊？点击展开...要是这样算的话，我10月2号才递交的。倒霉

评论
2010.10.02递交，10.06签收，11.08DM 12.01FN 12.02 12 12.09 2 2011.1.06面试（拒签）1.19发现怀孕，2011.9.18女儿出世，接下来准备二次申请了。。。回复: 肯尼大叔新动作，苦了还是那句：真的不怕，大不了告他，甚至告死康尼

评论
简单幸福的生活ing..........回复: 肯尼大叔新动作，苦了Therefore, effective today, CIC and CBSA officers must apply the new provision to allnew applications, all applications in process for which a final decision has not yet been rendered and all new and pending appeals before the Immigration Appeal Division (IAD).看样子，刚递交的和审理中的CASE都适用啊!倒是不怕他们查，就是时间耗不起啊！无奈~~~

  ·中文新闻 第七频道明星在与前雇主疏远后跳槽加入九号台的《今日》节目
·中文新闻 布里斯班北湖区伊甸湖周围的连续闪光器恐吓妇女